![]() Because they don't have the time, energy, or knowledge necessary to construct even the most basic healthy meal at home. Which was entirely my point, fast food is so cheap and easy to get, most of the lowest income earners will end up hitting that place rather than cooking things themselves. Just that they don't eat there all the time. ? I'm not saying that the Rich don't eat there. Rich (Exploitators) don't eat this trash. totally.īecause "Fast food" for poor peoples. Because all mcdonalds have russian hooligans employed there. I'll better die of hunger than eat this food After all, it is made by the guys behind Burnout. Oh, and ram the crap out of your opponents and turn them to scrap" with the physics being about as cartoony as they can without becoming Mario Kart. ![]() ![]() It's not a ultra-realistic hyper physics-tastic driving game where you zoom around and have to ensure that you break properly and downshift etc to get around a corner without spinning out, while tweaking every little thing on your car to ensure you get the best performance. not in terms of actual gameplay or anything, but what it represents. Most Wanted is probably the one that tickles me the most. I think if Cd projekt teamed up with somebody who knew how to do menus and just UI interface better, they'd have a SIGNIFICANTLY better game overall that'd earn a lot of fans.īeen Playing WoW (obviosly), Battlefield 3, Black Ops, and the new Need For Speed: Most Wanted. I liked Witcher 2, but it did need serious help when it came to the combat system. ![]() Nor does stupidity and propaganda create truth from thin air, in the face of studies. a more current claim than that of the Jewish peoples. So you're saying that the Jewish people should keep their rights to the land they'd been forced off of a millennium ago because of a "homeland" claim from that time? What makes THEIR "homeland" inherently THEIRS rather than anyone else's? I mean, what's to claim that I should own Ireland because I can trace my bloodline back to an King there? It's my ancient homeland that my family ruled 1000 years ago. Why do the Palestinians have more historical right to the land that Israel is now on, and also even if some people have been converted to Judaism why don't the Jews have a right to the same land? Can you provide proof that the Palestinians are the "rightful " inheritors of the land, as they were also converted to Islam? Your link you provided states this when it says "Just as most contemporary Christians and Muslims are the progeny of converted people" ĭidn't the Moors and the Ottomans also conquer and subjugate many nations and civilizations, didn't they also convert people to Islam? But once again no one has answered my question. One tribe, yeah! More you can find easily in numerous anthropological and historical investigations. Chinese Jews are Asians and Ephiopic Jews are Africans. Bucharian Jews have Central Asian origin, while Kavkaz Jews looks like other Kavkaz ethnicities. Ashkenazy is converted Slavs, Germans or Khazars. Jews aren't tribe or ethnicity, it's just someone converted into Jeudaism. I'm confused, aren't Jews originally from a tribe that lived in that land from thousands of years ago? What makes the Palestinians claim to the area more valid than the Jews?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |